 |
MOAB0104 - Oral Abstract Session
Examining the impact of CNS penetration effectiveness of combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) on neuropsychological outcomes in persons living with HIV: findings from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN) cohort study
Presented by Sean B. Rourke (Canada).
S.B. Rourke1,2,3, A. Carvalhal4, A.R. Zipursky1,2, T. Bekele1, J. McCombe5,6, A. Rachlis3,7, E. Collins8, M.J. Gill6, J. Raboud3,9, A. Burchell1,10
1Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, Canada, 2St. Michael's Hospital, Psychiatry, Toronto, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 4McMaster University, Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Hamilton, Canada, 5University of Alberta, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada, 6University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada, 7Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada, 8University of Toronto, Psychiatry, Toronto, Canada, 9University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, 10McGill University, Oncology, Montreal, Canada
Background: The prevalence of mild neurocognitive impairment
in HIV continues to increase in the era of cART. These impairments have a
significant impact on everyday functioning and quality of life. Letendre (2006,
2010) has shown an association between ARV regimens with higher CNS penetration
effectiveness (CPE) and improved CSF viral load response and neurological
outcomes. Methods: Within the OHTN Cohort Study, 545 persons received
neuropsychological testing at baseline evaluation and 255 were seen at
follow-up. Neuropsychological tests assessed working memory (Spatial Span),
complex psychomotor efficiency (Digit Symbol), dexterity (Grooved Pegboard),
and verbal learning/memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test). ARV agents were assigned a CPE score
according to Letendre 2006 and 2010 criteria, and summed to generate regimen CPE
scores. Sample: 82% male; mean age 47.5 years; mean education 13.9 years; mean
time with HIV 11.9 years; mean viral load log of 1.89; 67.5% had a nadir CD4 count
≤ 200. Results: Using Letendre criteria, we dichotomized the 2006
CPE scores into low (< 2, 42%) and high (≥2, 58%) effectiveness. We also dichotomized
the groups based on 2010 CPE scores into low (< 8, 38%) and high (≥8, 62%)
effectiveness. A generalized estimating equation was used to evaluate the
relationship between CPE of current ARV regimen and neuropsychological
outcomes. The analysis was adjusted for age, education, gender, CD4 nadir,
present viral load, time since HIV diagnosis, Hepatitis C diagnosis,
depression, and substance abuse. No significant associations were found between
CPE score and neurocognitive outcomes using either 2006 or 2010 criteria. Conclusions: In the first Canadian study to evaluate CPE score
and neurocognitive outcomes, there was no association between CNS penetration effectiveness
of ARV agents and neuropsychological outcomes. Subsequent analyses are being
conducted to examine the cumulative impact of length of ARV history and CPE
score on neurocognitive outcomes.
Back to the Programme-at-a-Glance
|
|